Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Year range
1.
National Technical Information Service; 2020.
Non-conventional in English | National Technical Information Service | ID: grc-753484

ABSTRACT

The overarching goal of this Program is to develop the scientific knowledge needed to predict and prevent the progression of IPF. We postulate that IPF is caused by recurrent injury/repair/regeneration at the bronchoalveolar junction secondary to overexpression of MUC5B, mucociliary dysfunction, retention of particles, ER stress, and disruption of normal reparative and regenerative mechanisms in the distal lung. During the first year of funding, we have (1) obtained local and DoD approvals for human and animal research;(2) enrolled 26 first degree relatives of individuals with IPF and completed all study procedures for Project 1;(3) performed ChIP, MNase, and TF binding assays to show that MUC5B promoter region is hyperchippable and that HIF1 and GCF bind in this region (Project 2);(4) imported and bred new strains of mice (St3gal3, Fut2, Ern2, Ift88, and Arl13b) in Projects 3 and 4;(5) developed and assessed the amounts and glycosylation of Muc5b in mouse models at baseline, and identified changes in polymer size and migration after inflammatory challenge (Project 3);(6) identified 10 weeks post-injury as a key timepoint for increased ciliogenesis in Muc5b Tg mice and began characterization of ciliogenesis in human lung, and (7) presented findings at two international conferences and published two manuscripts.

2.
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis ; 16:i019-i021, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1722291

ABSTRACT

Background: Treatment of perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (PFCD) is a major unmet need. Filgotinib (FIL) is a once-daily, oral, preferential Janus kinase 1 inhibitor in development for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. The efficacy and safety of FIL for the treatment of PFCD was evaluated in the phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled DIVERGENCE 2 study (NCT03077412). Methods: Patients (18-75 years old) with PFCD (documented diagnosis of CD for at least 3 months and 1-3 external openings [EOs] with drainage [spontaneous or on compression] for ≥ 4 weeks before screening) previously treated with antibiotics, immunomodulators and/or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were randomized (2:2:1) to receive FIL 200 mg, FIL 100 mg or PBO once daily for up to 24 weeks. Active luminal CD was permitted providing that the Crohn's Disease Activity Index score was ≤ 300 at screening. The primary endpoint was combined fistula response (reduction of ≥ 1 from baseline in the number of draining EOs determined by investigator assessment and no fluid collections > 1 cm on centrally read pelvic magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) at Week 24. Combined fistula remission (closure of all draining EOs present at baseline and no fluid collections > 1 cm) at Week 24 was a key secondary endpoint. The study was not powered for statistical comparisons and was prematurely terminated owing to low recruitment rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Baseline characteristics were broadly similar across the treatment groups (Table 1). Overall, 91.2% of patients had complex perianal fistulae and TNFi treatment had previously failed in 64.9% of patients. A lower proportion of patients randomized to receive FIL 200 mg discontinued the study compared with those who received PBO (Table 2). The proportion of patients who achieved a combined fistula response at Week 24 was numerically higher in the FIL 200 mg group (47.1%;90% confidence interval [CI]: 26.0-68.9) than in the PBO group (25.0%;90% CI: 7.2-52.7) (Figure 1), with similar results observed for combined fistula remission (FIL 200 mg [47.1%;CI: 26.0-68.9] versus PBO [16.7%;CI: 3.0-43.8]) (Figure 2). Treatment-emergent severe adverse events were highest in the FIL 200 mg group (Table 2). Adverse event rates were otherwise similar across treatment groups. Conclusion: In this phase 2 study, numerically higher fistula response and remission rates were observed after 24 weeks of treatment with FIL 200 mg versus PBO in patients with active PFCD and a history of multiple medical treatment failures. FIL was well tolerated overall. Further studies of FIL for the treatment of PFCD are warranted.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL